YouTube, Brute?

Regardless of where you think their loyalty lies in the user privacy debate, it’s hard to deny that YouTube is awesome.
That’s why, I assume, NY law firm Cohen & Grigsby thought it would be so awesome to put their immigration seminar on the super-popular site. Though, I doubt they thought it would be quite as super-popular as it became (yes, that does say 300,000 views and 2 video responses – eat your heart out, breakdancing cat.) CNN’s Lou Dobbs? Not a fan.
Why the attention? The video apparently instructs employers on how to make it look like they searched for qualified American workers before applying for work visas for foreign employees.
Well, the Department of Labor noticed all the media attention. And they’re not happy. From the ABA Journal:
[A]fter auditing the law firm’s filed permanent labor certification applications, beginning last year, the DOL announced today that it is placing the firm’s pending applications into department-supervised recruitment over concerns identified by the audits.
Probably not what they had in mind. In law school they told us to really watch what we put on facebook, because law firms would see it. Apparently that is also true for the firms themselves. But with the government. Then the government has to worry about regular people reading what they accidentally put on there.
The circle of life.
“This is unambiguously negative.”

Whoopee, Happy new year. 2008 is looking stellar so far.
The title quote is from the NY Times – it’s Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s, reacting to the DOL jobs report issued yesterday which shows unemployment at 5% for the first time since 2005 and a mere 18,000 jobs created. 18,000. When I saw it I hoped a decimal place was missing.
But, fear not, you massess of laid-off manufacturing workers! The President says your sacrifice was not in vain! White House spokesman Tony Fratto (Seriously? What happened to Snow? He was two spokesmen ago? And the other one was a chick? Man, I can’t keep track anymore…) Anyways, White House Spokesman-of-the-day Fratto said the report was “good news” (no joke) because the country was still creating jobs. From Forbes:
‘Anytime that you have more Americans working than you previously had, that is good news and certainly good news for those who have jobs,’ Fratto told reporters at the White House….
Ok, I’m not trying to bring down the lucky 18,000 government and food service employees that got paid last month, but when construction and manufacturing industries shed like 80,000 positions (again, no joke), it doesn’t take an economist to figure out what’s wrong with touting such meager job growth as a success. From the NYT article:
For the third consecutive month, wages grew slower than the pace of inflation, cutting into the real income of many workers. Among rank-and-file workers, who make up more than four-fifths of the labor force, average hourly earnings rose 3.7 percent last year, below the 4.3 percent rise in 2006.
Yeah, “good news” may be a stretch.
Thankfully, we’re not running for office, and the job market is merely a contributory factor to employment law, so we can just acknowledge and move on. This is just a friendly heads-up – it’s getting pretty recession-y out there, so watch where you step.
Tweets
- #NATO paranoia = best commute ever! 15 mins home to downtown! Thanks shadowy anarchist crazies! | 1 hour ago
- RT @Labor_Law: Second Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds Starbucks’ “One Union Button” Policy bit.ly/Kd3F48 #HR | 12 hours ago
- RT @jonhyman: New post: 6s wild! 6th Circuit affirms contractual 6 month limitation for employment claims goo.gl/fb/HNFB2 | 1 day ago
Recent Posts
Blogs I Read
- Connecticut Employment Law Blog
- Delaware Employment Law Blog
- Employer Law Report
- FMLA Insights
- Lawffice Space
- Minnesota Labor & Employment Law Blog
- Noncompete & Trade Secrets Blog
- Ohio Employer's Law Blog
- Ross Runkel's LawMemo
- The Employer Handbook
- The Proactive Employer by Stephanie Thomas
- Wisconsin Employment & Labor Law Blog





